Difficult:
The notation used for theorem 16.9 threw me a bit, making it hard to follow. Also, the proof for lemma 16.11 seems less than adequate.
Reflective:
It almost feels more natural to be in general rings and fields than to be in C or Q, now that I'm a little further into it. I suppose the rigor of 371 made it so for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment